Comparative Evaluation of Presence of Butterfly Effect in Transverse Sections of Incisors, Canines and Premolars – An In-Vitro Study

Authors

  • Rama Rao M S
  • V.S.S.K Sekhar
  • Kiran Kumar Ch
  • Tejasree Rathod R

Abstract

Aim: To compare the occurrence of the butterfly effect in the roots of incisors, canines and premolars. Materials and

methodology: A total of 30 extracted teeth were selected (incisors, canines and premolars of 10 each) and embedded in the clear acrylic and then sectioned into six thin sections of 1-mm thickness and are observed under light microscope at 5× magnification. Scoring was given on the presence or absence of the butterfly effect. 

Results: 80% of the incisor and canine groups showed the presence of butterfly effect, whereas it is 70% in case of premolar group. Conclusion: No significance difference in presence of butterfly effect in incisors, canines and premolars, with very slight predominance in incisors and canines. If present, this was uniform all along the root.


KEYWORDS: Butterfly effect, Dentinal tubules, Vertical fractures, Density ,sensitivity, intertubular dentin, instrumentation

References

Russell AA, Chandler NP, Hauman C, Siddiqui AY, Tompkins GRThe butterfly effect, an investigation of sectioned roots. J Endod 2013;39(2):208-10

Russell AA, Chris He LH, Chandler NP Investigation of dentin hardness in roots exhibiting the butterfly effect. J Endod 2014;40(6) 842-4.

Russell AA, Chandler NP, Hauman C, Siddiqui AY, Tompkins GR. Investigation of dentin hardness in roots exhibiting the butterfly effect. J Endod 2014;40(6).

Von Arex T, Gemmet Steiner R, Tray FR, Apical surgery: endoscopic findings at the resection level of 168 consecutively treated roots. Int Endod J 2011;44:290–302. Nadim Z. Baba Treatment planning considerations for endodontically treated teeth. In: Baba NZ, editor. Contemporary restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Quntessence; 2013. pp.25–6.

Haueisen H, Gärtner K, Kaiser L, Trohorsch D, Heidemann D.Vertical root fracture: prevalence, etiology and diagnosis. Quntessence Int

;44:467–74.

Beust TB, Reactions of the dentinal fibril to external irritation. J Am Dent Assoc 1931;18:1060–73.

Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JEA. Patterns of vertical root fractures: factors effecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003;29:524–8.

Sathorn CS, Palamara JM, Messer HH. Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis. J Endod 2005;31:288–92.

Barreto MS, Moraes Rado A, Rosa A. Vertical root fractures and dentin effects: effects of root canal preparation, filling and mechanical cyclining. J Endod 2012;38:1135–9.

Darrag AM, Fayyad DM. Adhesives in endodonticsENDO - Endodontic Practice Today 2011;5:87–105.

Kuçi A, Alaçam T, Yavaº O, Ergul-Ulger Z, Kayaoglu G Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1627-31

Rees JS, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29:997– 1003.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-07

Issue

Section

Original Research