Study of High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia for a Period of Five Years


  • Rajashekar Reddy B
  • Rameswarapu Suman Babu
  • Sujatha P


A relatively new development in the arena of prostatic histopathological study is the premalignant proliferative high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in the glandular epithelium, possibly relating to carcinoma. Aim of the study is HGPIN and its association with Prostatic hyperplasia and Prostatic carcinoma. The present study was undertaken in the Upgraded Department of Pathology, King George Hospital, Andhra Medical College for a period of five years from January 2002 to December 2006. A total of 340 cases evaluated, 277 (81.47%) were benign, 11 (3.23%) were premalignant and 52 (15.29%) malignant lesions. Premalignant lesions were preceded by a decade as compare to malignant lesions, with a mean age of 8 years difference. Among premalignant lesions only high grade prostatic intraepithelial lesion is seen in association with prostatic carcinoma (40%).


Bostwick DG, Amin MB, Damjanov I, Linder J, Prostate and seminal vesicles.editors. Anderson’s pathology. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby (1996). 2197-2230.

Bostwick DG, Brawer MK. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive cancer. Cancer (1987). 59: 788-94.

Epstein JI, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, McNeal JE, Sesterhenn IA, Troncoso P et al. Inter observer reproducibility in the diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol (1995). 19: 873-36.

Kirby RS, Timothy J Christmas, Brawer MK. Prostate cancer. 2nd ed. Mosby International Ltd. (2001).

Lee F, Torp Pederson ST, Carroll JT, Siders DB, Christensen-Day C, Mitchell AE. Use of transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology (1989). 24: 4-8.

Mc Neal JE, Bostwick DG. Intraductal dysplasia; a premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol (1986). 17: 64-71.

Troncoso P, Babaian RJ, Rojy et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive prostatic adenocarcinomas in cystoprostatectomy specimens. Urology (1989). 34: 52-56.

Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs (2002). 14-18.

De Silva MV, Fernando MS, Abeygunasekera AM, Serozsha Goonewardene SA. Prevalence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in surgical resections. Indian J Cancer (1998). 35: 137–41.

Arrabal-Polo MA, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Mijan-Ortiz JL, Arrabal-Martin M, Valle-Diaz de la Guardia F, et al. Relationship between biopsy Gleason score and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score in patients undergoing sextant vs 12 core biopsies. Arch Esp Urol (2010). 63: 791-96.

Qian J, Wollan P, Bostwick DG. The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol (1997). 28: 143-48.

Pacelli A, Bostwick DG. Clinical significance of high- grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in transurethral resection specimens. Urology (1997). 50(3): 355-59.






Original Research