Dental Imaging Array Technologies: A Review and Update
Digital radiography has evolved and co-existed with the dental imaging since four decades. The complete replacement of digital imaging in place of conventional screen-film combination has proved to be beneficial to the new era of dentistry. Because of low cost, higher patient comfort, increased dose efficiency, and greater dynamic range of digital detectors with possible reduction of radiation exposure to the patient, the digital imaging has created a new place for itself not only in medical radiology but in dentistry as well. The future will be digital, irrespective of CCDs, CMOS, or phosphor plates the advancement in the field of imaging is rapid and progressive with constantly replacing the older ones. The present paper discusses thoroughly about the various advancements in digital imaging starting from CCDs to flexible phosphor plates. Digital imaging, a substitute for conventional film radiography, has ventured into the arena of dentistry as well and revolutionised the imaging concepts of Oral Health Care Professionals.
KEYWORDS: CCD, CMOS, Phosphor plate, Digital imaging, Computed radiography, Direct radiography, Digital imaging, Conventional film.
Taylor SA. CCD and CMOS imaging array technologies – technology review. Technical Report EPC-1998-106; 1998.
Dhir P, David CM, Keerthi G. Digital imaging in dentistry: an overview. Int J Med Dent Sci 2014;3(2):88–91.
Korner M, Weber CH. Advances in digital- radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 2007;7(3):675–86.
Neitzel U. Status and prospects of digital detectortechnology for CR and DR. Radiat Prot Dosim 2005;114:32–8.
Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C. Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography. Rofo 2003;175:32–7.
Rowlands JA. The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:123–66.
Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M. Storage phosphor radiography. Eur Radiol 1997;7:58–65.
Christensen GJ. Clinical advantage of phosphor plate radiography. Clin Rep 2015;8(11):1–4.
Heyne JP, Sehner J, Neumann R, Wernerb, Adler R, Freesmeyer, Kaiser A. Reduction of radiation exposure by using storage phosphor radiography. Rofo 2002;174:104–11.
Bansal GJ. Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:425–8.
Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG, Webber RL. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:313–8.
Paurazas SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, Hoen MM, Steinman HR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodont 2000;89:356–62.
White SC, Pharaoh MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation, 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2009, pp. 82–9.
. Bedard A, Davis TD, Angelopoulos C. Storage phosphor plates:how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system? J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:57–69.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Print ISSN: 2347-6192
Online ISSN: 2347-6206